Abstract (14.0:@Realized causal observable in classical systems )

Abstract: As mentioned in the previous chapters, what is important is

 $\bullet$ to exercise the relationship of measurement and causality
In this chapter, we discuss the relationship more systematically. That is, we add the further argument concerning the realized causal observable. This field is too vast, thus, we mainly concentrate our interest to classical systems, particularly, Zeno's paradox. That is,

 $(\flat):$ to describe the flying arrow ( the best work in Zeno's paradoxes ) in terms of quantum language
Again recall that, as mentioned in $\S$1.1, the main purpose of this book is to assert the following figure 1.1:
This(particularly, ⑦--⑨) implies that quantum language has the following three aspects: $$\left\{\begin{array}{ll} \mbox{ ⑦ :the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics} \\ \mbox{ \qquad (i.e., the true colors of the Copenhagen interpretation) } \\ \\ \mbox{ ⑧ : the final goal of the dualistic idealism (Descartes=Kant philosophy) } \\ \\ \mbox{ ⑨ : theoretical statistics of the future } \end{array}\right.$$