Abstract (14.0: Realized causal observable in classical systems )
Abstract:
As mentioned in the previous chapters,
what is important
is
$\bullet$ 
to exercise the relationship of
measurement and causality

In this chapter,
we discuss the relationship more systematically.
That is, we add the further argument concerning
the realized causal observable.
This field is too vast, thus, we mainly concentrate our interest to
classical systems, particularly, Zeno's paradox.
That is,
$(\flat):$ 
to describe
the flying arrow ( the best work in Zeno's paradoxes )
in terms of quantum language

We believe that this is the final answer to Zeno's paradox.
Again recall that, as mentioned in $\S$1.1, the main purpose of this book is to
assert the following figure 1.1:
Fig.1.1: the location of "quantum language" in the worldviews
This(particularly, ⑦⑨) implies that quantum language has the following three aspects:
$$
\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
\mbox{ ⑦ :the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics}
\\
\mbox{
$\qquad$
(i.e., the true colors of the Copenhagen interpretation)
}
\\
\\
\mbox{ ⑧ :
the final goal of the dualistic idealism (Descartes=Kant philosophy)
}
\\
\\
\mbox{ ⑨ :
theoretical statistics of the future
}
\end{array}\right.
$$