Abstract: Measurement theory (= quantum language ) is formulated as follows. $\underset{\mbox{ (=quantum language)}}{\fbox{pure measurement theory (A)}} := \underbrace{ \underset{\mbox{ ($\S$2.7)}}{ \overset{ [\mbox{ (pure) Axiom 1}] }{\fbox{pure measurement}} } + \underset{\mbox{ ( $\S$10.3)}}{ \overset{ [{\mbox{ Axiom 2}}] }{\fbox{Causality}} } }_{\mbox{ a kind of incantation (a priori judgment)}} + \underbrace{ \underset{\mbox{ ($\S$3.1) }} { \overset{ {}}{\fbox{Linguistic interpretation}} } }_{\mbox{ the manual on how to use spells}}$ Measurement theory says that

 $\bullet$ Describe every phenomenon modeled on Axioms 1 and 2 (by a hint of the linguistic interpretation)!
In this chapter, we study Fisher statistics in terms of Axiom 1 ( measurement: $\S$2.7). We shall emphasize That is,
measurement and inference are the two sides of a coin

The readers can read this chapter without the knowledge of statistics.

Again recall that, as mentioned in $\S$1.1, the main purpose of this book is to assert the following figure 1.1: Fig.1.1: the location of "quantum language" in the world-views
This(particularly, ⑦--⑨) implies that quantum language has the following three aspects: $$\left\{\begin{array}{ll} \mbox{ ⑦ :the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics} \\ \mbox{ \qquad (i.e., the true colors of the Copenhagen interpretation) } \\ \\ \mbox{ ⑧ : the final goal of the dualistic idealism (Descartes=Kant philosophy) } \\ \\ \mbox{ ⑨ : theoretical statistics of the future } \end{array}\right.$$