1.0.: My answer to Feynman's question

Dr. R. P. Feynman (one of the founders of quantum electrodynamics) said the following wise words: $( \sharp_1 )$ and $( \sharp_2 )$.

 $(\sharp_1)$: There was a time when the newspapers said that only twelve men understood the theory of relativity. I do not believe there ever was such a time. There might have been a time when only one man did, because he was the only guy who caught on, before he wrote his paper. But after people read the paper a lot of people understood the theory of relativity in some way or other, certainly more than twelve. On the other hand, I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. $(\sharp_2)$: We have always had a great deal of difficulty understanding the world view that quantum mechanics represents.$\cdots \cdots$ I cannot define the real problem, therefore I suspect there's no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem.
In this lecture, I will answer Feynman's question ($\sharp_1$) and ($\sharp_2$) as follows.
 $(\flat)$: I am sure there's no real problem. Therefore, since there is no problem that should be understood, it is a matter of course that nobody understands quantum mechanics. That is, since there's no problem, what we can do is only "Shut up and calculate!" .

This answer may not be uniquely determined, however, I am convinced that the above ($\flat$) is one of the best answers to Feynman's question ($\sharp_1$) and ($\sharp_2$).

The purpose of this lecture is to explain the answer ($\flat$). That is, I show:
If we start from the answer ($\flat$), we can double the scope of quantum mechanics.
And further, I assert that
Metaphysics ( called "quantum language") is located at the center of science.
That is, \begin{align} & \mbox{To do science} \\ \doteqdot & \mbox{To describe phenomena by quantum language} \end{align} In this lecture, I will show the above.
If the reader knows quantum mechanics a little, it may be recommended to read the following references (before reading the blog):
 [1]: S. Ishikawa, gA New Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,Journal of Quantum Information Science,h Vol. 1 No. 2, 2011, pp. 35-42. doi: 10.4236/jqis.2011.12005 ( download free) [2]: S. Ishikawa, g Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Language: Reconsideration of Traditional Philosophies," Journal of quantum information science, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, pp.2-9.doi: 10.4236/jqis.2012.21002 ( download free) [3]: S. Ishikawa, gThe linguistic interpretation of quantum mechanics,harXiv:1204.3892v1[physics.hist-ph], (2012) ( download free)
[4]:S. Ishikawa, gLinguistic interpretation of quantum mechanics; Projection Postulateh Journal of Quantum Information Science, Vol. 5 No. 4, 2015, pp. 150-155. DOI: 10.4236/jqis.2015.54017 ( download free)